Forum - RE: Raid-0 performance on Windows 8.1 Preview

Win-Raid Forum (Drivers - Firmware - Modding) � System Performance � RAID Performance � Raid-0 performance on Windows 8.1 Preview

Page 2 of 2 � Page 1 2 Page �

Topic settings

Print view

Jump to forum

General & Forum related Topics News / Announcements Forum-related Questions & Suggestions Off Topic Important Drivers (AHCI/RAID, NVMe, USB etc.) General: Storage Drivers (AHCI/RAID, NVMe and USB) Specific: Intel AHCI/RAID Drivers Specific: NVIDIA nForce Chipset Drivers (incl. AHCI/RAID) Specific: NVMe Drivers Other Drivers System Performance RAID Performance AHCI/NVMe Performance Solid State Drives BIOS Modding BIOS Modding Guides and Problems BIOS modules (PCI ROM, EFI and others) BIOS Modding Requests Reports: BIOS Modding Results Offers: Already modded special BIOSes Special Topics Intel Management Engine CPU Microcodes NVMe Support for old Systems Other Tools (not BIOS modding related) Interesting PC Hardware & Software OS related Topics Windows 11 Windows 8-10/Server 2012-2019 Windows 7/Vista/Server 2008 Windows XP/2000/Server 2003 DOS/Windows 3.X/9X/ME - Retro Gaming Other Operating Systems

#16 | RE: Raid-0 performance on Windows 8.1 Preview datum

Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:40 pm (Last edited: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:50 pm)

Zitat von Fernando im Beitrag #15
@ odiebugs:

Yes, the upcoming Win8.1 will have 2 different Intel RAID drivers on board:[ol]
an old Intel MSM RAID driver v8.6.2.1024 dated 08/09/2010, which is named iaStorV.sys and only usable with ICH6R, ICH7R and C600=X79 Chipsets, and

Thanks, you must have known I was going to ask about the iastorav.sys.

I don't know why, but if you remember on win 8 I have never had fast TRIM, mostly GC was kicking in. I ran some benches on the iastorav and had slow TRIM or GC, then I installed the 12.8.0.1016, I have run optimize and I am getting TRIM in 5mins on the 1016, can't believe it.

If the RTM 9471 doesn't change much, this could be a really great OS, maybe even better then 7. Getting better benches then 7 also.

******** When I open your message there is nothing but blank page. I know you must have found the leak, but here is a place if anyone else wants it..

http://winclub.pl/index.php?/topic/326-build-9471-x64/

ASrock Z170 Extreme 7+, Z97, with a 4790. My RAID is somewhat faster using the 13 series SataDriver and driver then the 13 or 12 on the X79.
Cooler Master Stacker 830, Asrock Extreme 7, I7 3820, H100 cooler, GTX 670, Seasonic Platinum-860, 2-Samsung 840, 2- vector 180, 2-vector 150 2- Vectors, 2-Vertex 4, 1-Vertex 460, 4 Vertex 3.
Always have 2-RAID RST, Marvel RAID on 9182.

reply

#17 | RE: Raid-0 performance on Windows 8.1 Preview datum

Tue Aug 13, 2013 4:11 pm (Last edited: Tue Aug 13, 2013 4:12 pm)

Zitat von odiebugs im Beitrag #16
******** When I open your message there is nothing but blank page.

Do you mean my PM? Please try it once more. If you still should not be able to read it, I will send the content via eMail.

My current System:
MB: ASRock X570 Pro4, CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600, System Drive: 500 GB Samsung 980 Pro, Graphics: Sapphire Radeon RX570, OS: Win10 x64 Pro
Donation Link:
If you are satisfied with my Forum activities, you can send a donation to my personal PayPal account by clicking onto >this< link.

reply

#18 | RE: Raid-0 performance on Windows 8.1 Preview datum

Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:40 pm (Last edited: Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:42 pm)

If anyone needs to enable net 3.5 in the new 9471.

I found that the command -" dism.exe /online /enable-feature /featurename:NetFX3 /Source:C:\sources\sxs " did NOT work. Where C is the install media location.

But using limit access after SXS, works and allows the 3.5 to work along with 4. I ran in powershell (ADMIN)

dism.exe /online /enable-feature /featurename:NetFX3 /Source:C:\sources\sxs /LimitAccess

Fern: Yes PM, when I opened it there was nothing, but as you will see I replied. Thanks.

This build seems to be great so far.

reply

Lost TRIM in RAID0 after upgrade to Z87 � � Amd sb710 raid notifications and raid access via RaidXpert

Page 2 of 2 � Page 1 2 Page �

Please enter a reason for warning.