Success (eventually), after a couple of restarts, enabling the (updated) ATA ROM, and using a CTRL-J at the prompt (though nothing happened), my JMB36X controller is now available under standard PCI IDE and standard SATA AHCI (must check if hotplugging works) - previously the SATA side would be in IDE mode (no hotplug) or allow hotplug if the Win7 era JMB driver was used (which appeared under "storage controllers") - and I gave it the latest AMD AHCI as well - the modded JMB ROM may be worth collecting.


Correction: FAIL

With ATA ROM enabled, IDE works, SATA works, but hot plugging doesn't

With ATA ROM disabled in BIOS, IDE is missing, SATA is present, hot plugging still doesn't work
So nothing gained compared to the original, in fact, not as good as original with JMB driver.... guess I'll be swapping it back to the original (or later) ROM, unless I can find some way to force hotplug - have tried device manager search with no effect

Which ROM is best for PCIe SATA/IDE card with JMB363 chip?
Is v1.0.7.28 official and v1.0.8.01 unofficial?

Zitat von Fernando im Beitrag #1190

---

@ all:

new: Intel RST RAID ROM v16.7.0.3513 for the latest/upcoming Intel SATA RAID Controllers

It has to be tested, whether this Intel RAID ROM module works with Intel 100-Series Chipset RAID systems as well.

---

Zitat von Fernando im Beitrag #1179

---

Update of the Start post
Changelog:

• new: Intel RST(e) RAID ROM v16.5.0.3487 for the latest/upcoming Intel SATA RAID Controllers

Thanks to Pacman resp. Station-Drivers for the source file.

---

@Fernando

I'm always reading before writing. But nobody's perfect. When someone is "confused" about something, they post. This is why we have the forums. Based on what I wrote earlier, you can't honestly say that I didn't read. If I didn't read, then I wouldn't be able to post those questions. My questions are still valid though:

1. Why is there no link to v16.5.0.3487 in the original post of this thread when you clearly said you updated the original post when Pacman uploaded the file? And yes, the latest 16.5 RAID OROM is uploaded in the first post but why do you specifically recommend using a lower version (16.5.0.3487) instead?
2. My signature is outdated. I'm using an ASUS Maximus X Code (z370 chipset) now with Intel RAID. I know my questions wouldn't make sense if I use a 6-series chipset board. I'll update my signature now.

@Fernando:
Why do you recommend an older version for the 300 series? That's the real question here. 3487 is older than 3492. I understand that newer doesn't always mean better but if you recommend an older version that performs better, doesn't it make sense to include a link to that version in the original post too?

I'm not sure why is it that when you reply to me, you always take the aggressive route. I've been out of your forum for a few years now and now that I'm back I'm trying to read everything again. But everytime I post, you always make it look like I'm a stupid member that presents non-sensible questions with the aim of being spoonfed.

@Fernando:
No need to apologize, I can't imagine how much time you invest in updating all of your threads. I just wanted clarification, is all. Thanks for updating the thread, btw.

Well, I consider myself an average user (not a newbie and not a totally experienced one at that too, but I am technical).

a) I'm used to checking your forums and remember that you always don't recommend the "latest and greatest" drivers/firmwares/etc. After all, that's the reason of having recommendations. If the latest driver/firmware is the best one, then yes, the recommendations aren't needed at all. This is why I thought that the older one was better and asked why it wasn't linked in the start post.

b) As for the signature, that's my bad, I totally forgot about having signatures here.

EDIT: Btw, you forgot to edit the accompanying "recommended Intel RST(e) drivers in the start post, they're still at 16.0 and 16.5, respectively).