Forum - RE: [Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions

Win-Raid Forum (Drivers - Firmware - Modding) � BIOS Modding � BIOS Modding Guides and Problems � [ARCHIVE] Outdated UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions

Page 174 of 335 � Page 1 ... 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 ... 335 Page �

Topic settings

Print view

Jump to forum

General & Forum related Topics News / Announcements Forum-related Questions & Suggestions Off Topic Important Drivers (AHCI/RAID, NVMe, USB etc.) General: Storage Drivers (AHCI/RAID, NVMe and USB) Specific: Intel AHCI/RAID Drivers Specific: NVIDIA nForce Chipset Drivers (incl. AHCI/RAID) Specific: NVMe Drivers Other Drivers System Performance RAID Performance AHCI/NVMe Performance Solid State Drives BIOS Modding BIOS Modding Guides and Problems BIOS modules (PCI ROM, EFI and others) BIOS Modding Requests Reports: BIOS Modding Results Offers: Already modded special BIOSes Special Topics Intel Management Engine CPU Microcodes NVMe Support for old Systems Other Tools (not BIOS modding related) Interesting PC Hardware & Software OS related Topics Windows 11 Windows 8-10/Server 2012-2019 Windows 7/Vista/Server 2008 Windows XP/2000/Server 2003 DOS/Windows 3.X/9X/ME - Retro Gaming Other Operating Systems

#2596 | RE: [Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions datum

Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:35 pm (Last edited: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:41 pm)

@SoniX

Problem is still there:

It's not AMD-related. The problem is that when the size is 00000000, it's actually 00000800 (2KB).

This thread has been closed.

#2597 | RE: [Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions datum

Wed Aug 03, 2016 9:15 pm (Last edited: Thu Aug 04, 2016 4:08 am)

SoniX

Show info

Posts:	2420
Registered since:	06.01.2013
Location:	Russia

@plutomaniac

I understood you. You offer to make the substitution values

1
2
 
if ((check2[7] == 0x0000000) && (check2[8] == 0x0000000))
      check2[8] = 0x0000800;
 

But this is not correct, as we read the data as it is, and must validate the data as it is. My opinion is that if the file 00000000, the database must also be 00000000.
If other users are to use our products for their tasks, they will be a long time to think why we have so done. :)

mCodeInfo v0.4.4
- For older microcode size is 2048 KB. An explicit microcode size when scanning the database MCE.dat

Edit:
Remove file/

This thread has been closed.

#2598 | RE: [Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions datum

Wed Aug 03, 2016 10:02 pm

For the record, I can easily change all the 00000800 to 00000000 at the DB without causing any issues to MCE. Changing the size from 0 to 2048 can indeed be confusing if someone checks the DB only but it wasn't really built with that in mind. For example, at AMD I have added an extra dword (CHKMC) which is my own checksum of Header+Data (because AMD's checksum is only for pre-2010 and also checks only the Data and not Header+Data). So in that sense, someone could wonder what are those 4 bytes which are not found anywhere at the MC itself. What I'm trying to say is this: the DB is built in a way which will allow us to always know if a microcode is new or not, regardless of whether that makes it less eye-friendly. Same with MEA.dat, those SHA1 hashes at the end of each firmware are my own addition to be absolutely certain that we don't miss anything.

This thread has been closed.

#2599 | RE: [Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions datum

Wed Aug 03, 2016 10:15 pm

Iron logic. :)
Let DB be such as it is. Fix a couple of bytes that a brick hit the asphalt. ;)

This thread has been closed.

#2600 | RE: [Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions datum

Thu Aug 04, 2016 1:45 am (Last edited: Thu Aug 04, 2016 1:45 am)

If I put a winbond w25q64bv backwards in my ch341a for like a minute and it got really hot, could I have destroyed the chip? It still verifies and writes fine, I just don't get post now... The system turns on then shuts off immediately and keeps doing this. I even put the original bios back on(I've been running an ubu updated bios for a long time now, and just yesterday wanted to put the new ahci module v15 in).

EDIT: would it be worth it to order from alibaba?

This thread has been closed.

#2601 | RE: [Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions datum

Thu Aug 04, 2016 3:04 am (Last edited: Thu Aug 04, 2016 3:43 am)

@SoniX

8086-156F Intel CL Lan PXE 0.1.10

EDIT: Also, a "Realtek USB Ethernet Controller (xHCI) v2.07AD (05/24/16)" which Extractor failed to name properly. Maybe it's useful? No idea when it comes to such modules.

plutomaniac has attached files to this post

This thread has been closed.

#2602 | RE: [Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions datum

Thu Aug 04, 2016 9:36 am

If the v15 modules are for 100 series and up then who here has tested them on anything lower. I think they messed up my mobo. currently rmaing

This thread has been closed.

#2603 | RE: [Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions datum

Thu Aug 04, 2016 9:42 am

Hi!

At the moment i have on my Q45 chipset with 82567lm3 LAN the Option ROM 1.3.65. Could I install the latest CL 0.1.09 too without problem? (Baord has 5.2 management enginge)

This thread has been closed.

#2604 | RE: [Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions datum

Thu Aug 04, 2016 4:20 pm

Zitat von plutomaniac im Beitrag #2602

EDIT: Also, a "Realtek USB Ethernet Controller (xHCI) v2.07AD (05/24/16)" which Extractor failed to name properly. Maybe it's useful? No idea when it comes to such modules.

There is another oddity. The site Realtek, I did not find LAN USB OROM, only EFI.

This thread has been closed.

#2605 | RE: [Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions datum

Thu Aug 04, 2016 4:30 pm

@lgrootnoob:
No mainboard has no be RMAed after having flashed a BIOS, which contains a not usable Intel RAID ROM or EFI RaidDriver module. Just reflash a BIOS, which contains a matching Intel RAID ROM/EFI module and all will be fine again.

My current System:
MB: ASRock X570 Pro4, CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600, System Drive: 500 GB Samsung 980 Pro, Graphics: Sapphire Radeon RX570, OS: Win10 x64 Pro
Donation Link:
If you are satisfied with my Forum activities, you can send a donation to my personal PayPal account by clicking onto >this< link.

This thread has been closed.

#2606 | RE: [Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions datum

Thu Aug 04, 2016 10:00 pm (Last edited: Thu Aug 04, 2016 10:01 pm)

plutomaniac

Administrator

Show info

Posts:	5347
Registered since:	09.16.2014

@ SoniX:

I don't know. Maybe Realtek only posts the EFI module and the OROM is given to OEMs.

Regarding UBU, does that small addition look interesting to you?

Can be added easily if you like it:

1
2
3
4
 
if %mea%==1 (
	echo 9 - ME Analyzer
	for /f "tokens=1-5" %%a in ('MEA\MEA.exe bios.bin -extr -adir -disuf') do (echo      %%a %%c %%d)
	)
 

Token 5 (%%e) is the Date but I haven't included it above

This thread has been closed.

#2607 | RE: [Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions datum

Thu Aug 04, 2016 10:07 pm (Last edited: Thu Aug 04, 2016 10:43 pm)

@ plutomaniac

Cool! Thank You, Now add. :)

Edit:
Supported with MEA 1.5.8 and above. ;)

This thread has been closed.

#2608 | RE: [Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions datum

Fri Aug 05, 2016 1:56 am (Last edited: Fri Aug 05, 2016 1:58 am)

Zitat von Fernando im Beitrag #2606
@lgrootnoob:
No mainboard has no be RMAed after having flashed a BIOS, which contains a not usable Intel RAID ROM or EFI RaidDriver module. Just reflash a BIOS, which contains a matching Intel RAID ROM/EFI module and all will be fine again.

Are you serious? I flashed it about 5 or 6 times, on both chips, each time verifiying TWICE and using the bios from the asus website and my original backup. they also all sha256 the same. the board acts the same way as if there is no chip in it every time just turning on for half a second then off and doing that constantly.

EDIT: I'm pretty sure it has to do with letting the chips get so hot being backwards in the ch341a. It's been a couple months since ive flashed with it and I had forgot some things. I checked the solder joints under the board for the bios sockets and they looked fine.

This thread has been closed.

#2609 | RE: [Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions datum

Fri Aug 05, 2016 2:30 pm

Zitat von plutomaniac im Beitrag #2602
@SoniX

8086-156F Intel CL Lan PXE 0.1.10

EDIT: Also, a "Realtek USB Ethernet Controller (xHCI) v2.07AD (05/24/16)" which Extractor failed to name properly. Maybe it's useful? No idea when it comes to such modules.

- OROM Inrel Lan Boot Agent CL v0.1.10 How can I upgrade it?
any info about it?

Ubu 1.5.8 no update orom!!

Thanks

Regards

http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6797240169

This thread has been closed.

#2610 | RE: [Discussion] UBU Tool related Questions, Reports and Suggestions datum

Fri Aug 05, 2016 3:25 pm

Zitat von el_zari im Beitrag #2610
Ubu 1.5.8 no update orom!!

It can not be.
If the BIOS on Aptio5 platform and OROM is in store GUID A032, then - yes. In this case, you have to update yourself with the help of UEFITool,

This thread has been closed.

BIOS Company �

Page 174 of 335 � Page 1 ... 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 ... 335 Page �

Please enter a reason for warning.