Forum - RE: Intel EFI RAID "SataDriver" BIOS Modules

#241 | RE: Intel EFI RAID "SataDriver" BIOS Modules datum

Mon Mar 30, 2015 5:00 pm

Zitat von Fernando im Beitrag #240
Zitat von temroa im Beitrag #239
what do you think should i update ?
Nothing.
The hex code differences within the second line are mainly caused by the checksum correction The checksum-8 of the entire FFS module has to be 0 and the correction is usually done within the second line.

what is checksum-8 ?

reply

#242 | RE: Intel EFI RAID "SataDriver" BIOS Modules datum

Mon Mar 30, 2015 6:06 pm (Last edited: Tue Mar 31, 2015 12:58 am)

Zitat von temroa im Beitrag #241
what is checksum-8 ?

Open the FFS file with the tool HxD and hit "Analysis" > "Checksums". There you will find the "Checksum-8".
If you want to know, what "Checksum-8" (= Checksum 8 Bit) means, please look >here<.

My current System:
MB: ASRock X570 Pro4, CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600, System Drive: 500 GB Samsung 980 Pro, Graphics: Sapphire Radeon RX570, OS: Win10 x64 Pro
Donation Link:
If you are satisfied with my Forum activities, you can send a donation to my personal PayPal account by clicking onto >this< link.

reply

#243 | RE: Intel EFI RAID "SataDriver" BIOS Modules datum

Mon Mar 30, 2015 6:11 pm

Zitat von Fernando im Beitrag #242
Zitat von temroa im Beitrag #241
what is checksum-8 ?
Open the FFS file with the tool HxD and hit "Analalysis" > "Checksums". There you will find the "Checksum-8".
If you want to know, what "Checksum-8" (= Checksum 8 Bit) means, please look >here<.

sorry for my bad english if there needs to be modifications then can you do that ? i didnt got what you mean exactly because of my poor english.

reply

#244 | RE: Intel EFI RAID "SataDriver" BIOS Modules datum

Mon Mar 30, 2015 6:22 pm (Last edited: Mon Mar 30, 2015 6:27 pm)

Zitat von temroa im Beitrag #243
i didnt got what you mean exactly because of my poor english.

What did you not understand?
The customization of a BIOS file needs a certain knowledge about the BIOS structure and the hex code rules, but not about the english language.

Zitat von temroa im Beitrag #243
sorry for my bad english if there needs to be modifications then can you do that ?

No, I will not do that for you, because I don't want to be responsable for a bricked notebook.

My current System:
MB: ASRock X570 Pro4, CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600, System Drive: 500 GB Samsung 980 Pro, Graphics: Sapphire Radeon RX570, OS: Win10 x64 Pro
Donation Link:
If you are satisfied with my Forum activities, you can send a donation to my personal PayPal account by clicking onto >this< link.

reply

#245 | RE: Intel EFI RAID "SataDriver" BIOS Modules datum

Mon Mar 30, 2015 6:28 pm

both is F8

reply

#246 | RE: Intel EFI RAID "SataDriver" BIOS Modules datum

Mon Mar 30, 2015 6:33 pm

Zitat von temroa im Beitrag #245
both is F8

Both what?

My current System:
MB: ASRock X570 Pro4, CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600, System Drive: 500 GB Samsung 980 Pro, Graphics: Sapphire Radeon RX570, OS: Win10 x64 Pro
Donation Link:
If you are satisfied with my Forum activities, you can send a donation to my personal PayPal account by clicking onto >this< link.

reply

#247 | RE: Intel EFI RAID "SataDriver" BIOS Modules datum

Mon Mar 30, 2015 6:37 pm (Last edited: Mon Mar 30, 2015 6:44 pm)

Zitat von Fernando im Beitrag #246
Zitat von temroa im Beitrag #245
both is F8
Both what?

both files.checksum is same
also i have compared the files and program said files are same

reply

#248 | RE: Intel EFI RAID "SataDriver" BIOS Modules datum

Mon Mar 30, 2015 7:00 pm (Last edited: Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:14 pm)

i have flashed and its worked.

reply

#249 | RE: Intel EFI RAID "SataDriver" BIOS Modules datum

Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:21 pm (Last edited: Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:21 pm)

Zitat von temroa im Beitrag #247
both files.checksum is same
also i have compared the files and program said files are same

Please let us know, which BIOS modules (name and version of the files) you have compared.

Zitat von temroa im Beitrag #248
i have flashed and its worked.

Congratulations, but I would rather like to know,
a) what "worked" (the flashing procedure or the expected boost of your notebook performance) and
b) which updated BIOS modules did you insert?

My current System:
MB: ASRock X570 Pro4, CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600, System Drive: 500 GB Samsung 980 Pro, Graphics: Sapphire Radeon RX570, OS: Win10 x64 Pro
Donation Link:
If you are satisfied with my Forum activities, you can send a donation to my personal PayPal account by clicking onto >this< link.

reply

#250 | RE: Intel EFI RAID "SataDriver" BIOS Modules datum

Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:46 pm (Last edited: Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:47 pm)

Zitat von Fernando im Beitrag #249
Zitat von temroa im Beitrag #247
both files.checksum is same
also i have compared the files and program said files are same
Please let us know, which BIOS modules (name and version of the files) you have compared.
Zitat von temroa im Beitrag #248
i have flashed and its worked.
Congratulations, but I would rather like to know,
a) what "worked" (the flashing procedure or the expected boost of your notebook performance) and
b) which updated BIOS modules did you insert?

I compared mine(before)IvbGopDriver to ubu's IvbGopDriver.

here what ı've installed:
EFI Gop Driver ivy bridge 3.0.1027
EFI Gop Driver sandy bridge 2.0.1024
OROM Realtek Boot Agent 2.61

performance is same since i have updated me firmware and installed true drivers.

reply

#251 | RE: Intel EFI RAID "SataDriver" BIOS Modules datum

Tue Mar 31, 2015 1:00 am

Zitat von temroa im Beitrag #250
I compared mine(before)IvbGopDriver to ubu's IvbGopDriver.
here what ı've installed:
EFI Gop Driver ivy bridge 3.0.1027
EFI Gop Driver sandy bridge 2.0.1024
OROM Realtek Boot Agent 2.61
performance is same since i have updated me firmware and installed true drivers.

Thanks for the requested infos.
Last question:
Which OS are you running and with which mode (LEGACY or UEFI) has it been installed?

My current System:
MB: ASRock X570 Pro4, CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600, System Drive: 500 GB Samsung 980 Pro, Graphics: Sapphire Radeon RX570, OS: Win10 x64 Pro
Donation Link:
If you are satisfied with my Forum activities, you can send a donation to my personal PayPal account by clicking onto >this< link.

reply

#252 | RE: Intel EFI RAID "SataDriver" BIOS Modules datum

Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:28 am (Last edited: Tue Mar 31, 2015 12:09 pm)

Zitat von Fernando im Beitrag #251
Which OS are you running and with which mode (LEGACY or UEFI) has it been installed?

Win 8.1 core single language x64 UEFİ

EDIT by Fernando: Unneeded quoted text deleted (to save space)

reply

#253 | RE: Intel EFI RAID "SataDriver" BIOS Modules datum

Tue Mar 31, 2015 12:11 pm

Zitat von temroa im Beitrag #252
Zitat von Fernando im Beitrag #251
Which OS are you running and with which mode (LEGACY or UEFI) has it been installed?
Win 8.1 core single language x64 UEFİ

Thanks.
This means, that your updated Option ROM modules will not be used at all.

My current System:
MB: ASRock X570 Pro4, CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600, System Drive: 500 GB Samsung 980 Pro, Graphics: Sapphire Radeon RX570, OS: Win10 x64 Pro
Donation Link:
If you are satisfied with my Forum activities, you can send a donation to my personal PayPal account by clicking onto >this< link.

reply

#254 | RE: Intel EFI RAID "SataDriver" BIOS Modules datum

Thu Apr 02, 2015 5:45 am

Hi Fernando,

Was trying to replace satadriver in a Gigabyte Z87X UD5H with bios F9 and I get file size exceeds volume size error. I also updated the 8086-2822 to 13.6.0.2164. The satadriver was at index #24 and so I deleted it and then inserted 'as compressed'. Does inserting as compressed make a difference? Also the index number is no longer #24 but one of the last ones. Does that also make a difference?

Thank you.

reply

#255 | RE: Intel EFI RAID "SataDriver" BIOS Modules datum

Thu Apr 02, 2015 10:09 am

Zitat von davidm71 im Beitrag #254
Does inserting as compressed make a difference?

No.

Zitat
Also the index number is no longer #24 but one of the last ones. Does that also make a difference?

No, a freshly inserted BIOS module (except Option ROM ones, which are within the CSMCORE) will always be added at the end of the related "Volume". This has no effect on its function.

My current System:
MB: ASRock X570 Pro4, CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600, System Drive: 500 GB Samsung 980 Pro, Graphics: Sapphire Radeon RX570, OS: Win10 x64 Pro
Donation Link:
If you are satisfied with my Forum activities, you can send a donation to my personal PayPal account by clicking onto >this< link.

reply

Please enter a reason for warning.