[b][/b]
[i][/i]
[u][/u]
[s][/s]
[code][/code]
[quote][/quote]
[spoiler][/spoiler]
[url][/url]
[img][/img]
[video][/video]
Smileys
smile
smile2
spook
alien
zunge
rose
shy
clown
devil
death
flash
sick
heart
idee
frage
blush
smokin
mad
sad
wink
frown
crazy
grin
hmm
laugh
mund
oh
rolling_eyes
lil
oh2
shocked
cool
[mail][/mail]
[pre][/pre]
Farben
[rot][/rot]
[blau][/blau]
[gruen][/gruen]
[orange][/orange]
[lila][/lila]
[weiss][/weiss]
[schwarz][/schwarz]
e.v.o
Posts: 125 | Last online: 07.25.2017
Name
Velocet
Hobbies
Sex, Drugs & Goth'n Roll
Location
Köln, Germany
Date registered
07.12.2015
Sex
not specified
    • Zitat von SoniX im Beitrag #3003
      @ ALL

      There is a suggestion to remove all files and folders IRST (e) from the folder "Modules\IRST".
      Instead, leave only 2 empty folders "Modules\IRST" and "Modules\IRSTe", in which the user can put the file versions that are relevant to him.
      Thus, it will be possible to select the proper versions, and not what UBU offers,
      The IRST and IRSTe files will be in a separate archive.
      I think this will make it harder for some people but from my point of view it's the better solution. Maybe a link to this forum and the thread where one could download the corresponding EFI/ROM would be a good idea

    • UBU replaces the Haswell ULT (CPUID 40651) with the normal Haswell microcode (CPUID 306C3). Does this work? If not: Is it possible to expand UBU so that it works with Haswell ULT CPUs?

      I attached the latest Haswell ULT microcode.

    • Zitat von FirstEver im Beitrag #1982
      I can insert the NVMe module after last 'DXE driver' but it this cases the last 'PEI module' will be Rebuilded - is it ok?
      I think you are in the wrong section. Normally there is a DXE section and after that a PEI section...

    • e.v.o has written a new post "[Guide] Flashing modified AMI Aptio UEFI using AFU" 05.30.2017

      Zitat von Ferrous im Beitrag #69
      If the /GAN parameter doesn't work (shows success but actually makes no difference), Intel FPT should be the last choice.

      But FPT doesn't work when the SPI flash lock is enabled?

      Zitat von Ferrous im Beitrag #69
      Off topic:
      Zitat von Fernando im Beitrag #68
      Will you add a link to the latest AFU version, which supports the /GAN command?

      You used the relative clause wrongly.
      The comma before the relative pronoun which means that it is a non-restrictive(non-defining) relative clause. It should be a restrictive(defining) relative clause here, so the comma must be removed.
      The word latest is a superlative, in this case you should use that as the relative pronoun instead of which.
      So the correct version is:
      Will you add a link to the latest AFU version that supports the /GAN command?


      Great! You (and everyone else!) should do this more often... and you could also have a look at my posts cause i think they also have a few "errors" in them ;>

    • e.v.o has written a new post "[Guide] Flashing modified AMI Aptio UEFI using AFU" 05.29.2017

      Zitat von dmitryBz im Beitrag #65
      /gan option is unknown command.

      @dmitryBz Because you are using the wrong version. The /GAN option wasn't an official way to flash a modified BIOS and was removed in version 3.07.00 and up. The tutorial here isn't up to date. You will find a DOS executable with /GAN option attached.

      @Fernando
      Could you maybe update the start posting with my attached version which supports /GAN?

      @all
      Could someone provide the latest AFU version which has /GAN support? This was version 3.06.01.

    • e.v.o has written a new post "How to keep a Samsung M.2 SSD cool" 05.24.2017

      just my 2 cents:

      The shown m.2 cooling solution is crap in many ways and absolutely not necessary:
      - You don't need active cooling for a SSD. Passive cooling is enough for this kind of consumer SSDs (also for the 960 Pro).
      - The fan makes extra noise
      - The height is a problem: You can't use the next PCIe slot
      - The fan probably needs an extra cable for power which is a bit stupid when you are using a adapter card which could normally handle this

      I bought this adapter which has cooling included: https://shop.aquacomputer.de/product_inf...roducts_id=3659
      This solutions makes way more sense cause the back also gets cooled and you can still use the next PCIe slot. Since it sits above the GPU there is enough airflow to cool it.

      If you have a m.2 slot on your motherboard or have a adapter card then you should go with something like this: https://shop.aquacomputer.de/product_inf...roducts_id=3660

    • e.v.o has written a new post "[Guide] Manual AMI UEFI BIOS Modding " 05.21.2017

      Zitat von futiless im Beitrag #190
      SAY WHAT : I'm all ears how do I do this I also have this e5-2699 v3 what mods did you make to the microcode.

      You don't mod the microcode. Just use an old version and that's it.

    • Zitat von SOSKI_KROTA im Beitrag #1961
      I got Gigabyte p85-d3 motherboard and i want either one of those 2 ssds:

      https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a...N82E16820249085
      https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a...=9SIA4S857X3214

      They differ mainly in form factor: one is m.2 2280 and the other is AIC

      The AIC one is PCIe x4 (which i have on my motherboard) so i would rather buy AIC so i don't need to buy an adapter. Does it matter in this case?
      Which should i buy?

      Got one more question: does success rate of this manupulation really justify the risk of buying hardware you prolly can't use?


      It would be good if you inform yourself (and i am not talking about asking questions on forums) about the whole topic. But back to your questions:
      It doesn't matter which one you buy but i would go with a Samsung 960 Evo or it's OEM counterpart the Samsung PM961 plus a m.2 > PCIe adapter: Better performance and bang for the buck. But if you really wanna get the Plextor then stick to the m.2 plus a adapter: If you every get e newer system you could simply just swap the SSD in it or use it in a laptop.

      If really does justify the risk of buying. But this is something you have to answer yourself before buying.

    • @SoniX
      Well.. i have to thank you for UBU and your work! If i can help you in any way then please let me know :)

    • Zitat von Fernando im Beitrag #2962
      @e.v.o:
      Although it obviously was your intention to help
      a) the Forum visitors, who are always waiting for an updated UBU version, and
      b) SoniX, who has written, that he doesn't have the required time to create a new UBU tool version,
      I am not sure, whether it was a good idea to offer a v1.67 of SoniX's UBU tool.
      Did you get his ok, before you published the new version?
      If not, you should remove your links.
      I want to avoid everything, what may end with SoniX's "good-bye" to our Forum.
      I am sorry! I would not harm anyone! Just read he didn't had the time so i thought i could do it and help him. It is his tool and will always be. But i am removing it since i didn't get his ok.

    • Fixed.

    • I updated UBU to version 1.67 to give something back. Thanks SoniX! I hope thats okay. I also changed the script to incorporate the updates. MMTool ist NOT included.

      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      12
      13
      14
      15
      16
      17
      18
      19
      20
      21
      22
      23
      24
      25
      26
      27
      28
      29
      30
      31
      32
      33
      34
      35
      36
      37
      38
      39
      40
      41
      42
       
      # UEFI BIOS Updater (UBU)
       
      ## [1.67] - 2017-05-15
      ### Added
      - Intel RST enterpise EFI and OROM (DevID 2826, 2827, 1d68/1d69) - 5.0 Branch
      -- SATA and sSATA 4.5.0.1012 > 5.0.0.1217 (oROM)
      -- SATA 4.5.0.1012 > 5.0.0.1139 (EFI)
       
      - Intel CPU MicroCodes
      -- 1150 - Haswell/Broadwell
      --- cpu000306C3_plat32_ver00000022_date27-01-2017
      --- cpu00040671_plat22_ver00000017_date27-01-2017
      -- 1151 - Skylake/Kabylake
      --- cpu000506E3_plat36_ver000000BA_date09-04-2017
      --- cpu000906E9_plat22_ver00000058_date09-03-2017
      -- 2011v3 - Haswell-E/Broadwell-E
      --- cpu000406F1_platEF_ver0B000021_date01-03-2017
      --- cpu000406F1_platEF_ver0B000020_date02-02-2017
      --- cpu000306F2_plat6F_ver0000003A_date30-01-2017
       
      - MMTool.txt
      -- Contains MMTool.exe hashes for verification
       
      ### Changed
      - ME Analyzer v1.10.2 > v1.11.2
      - ME Analyzer IME FW Repository DB Revision r82 > r86
      - MC Extractor Microcode Repository DB Revision r21 > r26
      - UEFIFind 0.10.6 > UEFIFind 0.10.8
      - GenFfs Version 0.1 Build 16164 > Version 0.1 Build 23431
      - GenSec Version 0.1 Build 16164 > Version 0.1 Build 23431
      - LzmaCompress Version 0.2 Build 16164 > Version 0.2 Build 23431
       
      - Intel EFI GOP Driver
      -- Skylake and Kabylake 9.0.1063 > 9.0.1064
       
      - Intel LAN only chips 82579/i217/i218/i219
      -- EFI Gigabit Undi 0.0.16 > 0.0.17
       
      ### Fixed
      - Typo: ..\Modules\mCode\1151\cpu000906E9_plat22_ver0000003C_date05-09-2016.bin > cpu000906E9_plat22_ver0000003C_date#05-09-2016.bin
       
      Many Thanks to SoniX - see Info.mht
       



      Download:
      N/A



      --- EDIT

      No more available. Just here for info reasons on latest versions.

    • e.v.o has written a new post "ASUS CrossHair V Formula Z MOD bios 2201" 05.14.2017

      ASUS is so god damn xxxx shitty when i comes to their BIOSes. I really hate them for this situation.

      EDIT by Fernando: The f-word has been deleted. I don't want to see such words within my Forum.

    • e.v.o has written a new post "Intel security assist?" 05.14.2017

      Zitat von deterministik im Beitrag #1
      when i install intel MEI drivers from my motherboard manufacturer i get a application called Intel Security Assist. Does anyone know how this is related to Intel MEI?? i cant find any information regarding this tool

      btw is it safe to upgrade the latest drivers from this site on X99 asus motherboard? Is the MEI drivers modified by asus? I know that the Intel ethernet drivers are because i can not install official latest drivers from intel.


      You don't need any of the ME software. Drivers are enough. The rest should not bother you.
      AFAIK MEI Drivers never get modified by OEMs.
      It's safe to upgrade to the latest drivers.
      If you can't install the latest drivers and you probably choose the wrong drivers?

    • e.v.o has written a new post "Intel Management Engine: Drivers, Firmware & System Tools" 05.09.2017

      Zitat von bronxamigo im Beitrag #2892
      Zitat von e.v.o im Beitrag #2888
      If it would be possible to flash the ME without the need for a SPI that would be great :)

      Yes. IIRC for HM86 I applied momentary weak +3V on the HDA_SDO (pin A24) at power on. It was either that, or ground the pin. You need trial and error to get the timing.

      Nice. Thanks! Will give it a shot as soon as i find some time.

      Zitat von bronxamigo im Beitrag #2892
      To be honest, I don't think HM86 is hardware limited from running Haswell Refresh (i.e. initial information shared here could be wrong). There are boards with this configuration if you google. It would be great if anyone has any idea what BIOS prerequisites allow me to flash MEI 9.1.x
      I examined a ASRock BIOS where they updated from 9.0 to 9.1. There were only 4 modules in the BIOS that were changed. One of them was MePlatformPolicy. Dunno what it does but the name suggests to look there ;)

    • e.v.o has written a new post "Intel Management Engine: Drivers, Firmware & System Tools" 05.09.2017

      Zitat von Ferrous im Beitrag #2889
      Zitat von e.v.o im Beitrag #2888
      Are you really sure about this? I don't think so cause normally this is only the case if it's a newer version...
      Get overwritten by older one, I mean..

      @plutomaniac Sorry to mention you here but just to clarify this one last time (maybe @Fernando could put this in the start posting):
      From what i know it is not possible to flash the same version or older ME versions. This is only possible if there is no lock present (which normally isn't the case) or you are doing it via a SPI flasher.
      Is this correct?

Recipient
e.v.o
Subject:


text:
{[userbook_noactive]}


Xobor Forum Software von Xobor